I will pay for the following article The Interpretation of Protheros Thoughts in the Book Catastrophes. The work is to be 5 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. In the 1700s, the church discouraged inquisitions into the phenomena that resulted in catastrophes. In fact, ancient scholars such as Aristotle were jailed for writing journals about science. Therefore, people believed in religious dogmas that inhibited the understanding of the catastrophe occurrence, thus heightened the chance of loss or damage. Based on Prothero’s interpretation, the risk from catastrophes becomes manageable when there is a possibility of explaining the phenomena using mathematical or natural laws. Risk refers to the potential that an action or phenomena may result in an undesirable outcome characterized by the loss. Using the word potential indicates that we have the ability to control the outcome. Catastrophes are natural hazards. thus, their outcome presents a risk. In the context of this summary, risk focuses on the undesirable outcomes based on changes in the environment. Risk assessment involves the investigation of the quantitative and qualitative risk based on the hazard. In the book Catastrophes! The author analyses major catastrophes in the USA concerning risk. Prothero (2011) believes that assigning a value to a natural disaster’s relative hazard can assess the risk associated with each catastrophe (226). The values assigned are calculated to reflect percentages below. An acceptable risk refers to a risk that can be neglected without serious consequences. This is the level of risk around which humanity can survive. Natural phenomena present many risks that can be disregarded since the probability of causing harm to inflict pain is not high. A good example of acceptable risk highlighted in Prothero’s work is wildfires with a low of 0.4%. It is important to note that the magnitude of risk depends on humanitarian consideration.